Although Sean “Diddy” Combs wished to testify in his trial, the protection is not going to name him as a witness. In accordance to many attorneys, that is the appropriate transfer. If the protection put Combs on the stand, they risked damaging cross-examination by the prosecution. One authorized professional stated Combs solely stood to lose by getting on the stand.
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs would have made an enormous mistake by testifying in his trial, stated legal professional
On Monday, Combs’ legal professional, Marc Agnifilo, signaled that Combs wouldn’t testify in his trial. Agnifilo had beforehand said that Combs completely wished to take the stand. New York Regulation Faculty professor Anna Cominsky stated placing Combs on the stand was too large a bet for the protection.
“Diddy has every part to lose and nothing to achieve by testifying,” she instructed The Independent. “Presently he has the presumption of innocence, and the burden of proof which lies squarely with the prosecution. Earlier than testifying, his attorneys can proceed to depend on these authorized rules and push the jury arduous on whether or not or not the federal government has met its burden.”
She stated that Combs’ testimony may decide the result of the trial.
“The reality of the matter is, if he testifies and they don’t imagine him, there’ll nearly actually be a responsible verdict,” she stated.
Permitting Combs to take the stand would additionally permit the prosecution to query him in regards to the now-infamous video footage of him attacking Cassie Ventura in a resort.
“I have no idea any protection legal professional who would need to have their consumer cross-examined with a video just like the video from the resort in this case, not to mention all the different alleged felony exercise, in explicit the allegations of abuse,” Cominsky stated. “With respect to his pending civil instances, usually talking, something he says can, and completely will, be used in opposition to him.”
The protection is not going to name any witnesses in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ trial
The prosecution known as 34 witnesses as they introduced their case in opposition to Combs. In contrast, the protection will name no witnesses. Former federal prosecutor Mark D. Chutkow shared the doable rationale behind this determination.
“[Their] determination not to name any witnesses will even permit his protection crew to argue to the jury throughout closing that there was no want to take up any extra of the jury’s time, as a result of the protection already confirmed sufficient affordable doubt throughout their cross-examination of the federal government’s witnesses,” Chutkow instructed People. “It additionally permits the protection to remind the jury that Diddy has a presumption of innocence and the federal government at all times has the burden of proving his guilt, which it hasn’t finished.”
He added that “much less is extra” is commonly greatest for the protection, because the prosecution bears the burden of reality.
He may face a sentence of life in jail
Prosecutors charged Combs with one rely of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of intercourse trafficking by pressure, fraud, or coercion, and two counts of transportation to interact in prostitution. He pleaded not responsible to all expenses.
If Combs is discovered responsible, he may face a sentence of life in jail. If convicted, he faces a minimal of 15 years in jail.
